Part of the work we did was work on how to check it, and with some collaboration with Erica and some ideas from Dylan Wiliam's Embedded Formative Assessment, students have a quarter sheet of paper to check 5 assignments. I can share this if anyone wants it. Most days students self check. Others they peer check. Once in awhile, a whole group switches their work with another group so they get a different group's opinion of their work. Also, if and when students lose the checking sheet, if they want credit, they have to show it to me personally, and of course I look it over a lot more closely!
Participation quizzes have been helpful, as well as pair checks, which I detailed in an NCTM blog post recently. After a recent Skype meeting, Erica reminded me and suggested I use the Hot Seat strategy. The rules are detailed below in the Google slides, as well as the problems students focused on. I had never used this strategy before as I was concerned about the competitive feel, students feeling inferior, and the timing of the activity. I will address those concerns in this post.
So, as described in the first slide above, 1 student brings their seat to the back of the room, and works individually with no help. To make this quick, I said resource manager (assigned team roles based on the alphabetical order of their first name in their group). If they get it right, they earn their team 2 points. If everyone in their group gets it right with all work shown, the team gets 1 point. I kept track of the points, and students were very honest. It was instant formative assessment.
As you can see, we are finishing up Chapter 6 which has closure problems. Instead of saying students, work on these problems. I mixed up the order and focused it on transformations.
For the first problem, students only needed 3 minutes to figure out the scale factor. Some asked which is the original and which is the new figure? I told them they could decide. I also said to not use calculators.
|Students in the back row are on the hot seat.|
I asked students for feedback informally in each class. A student that doodles and doesn't engage with her group much liked that it was more individual based and the timing made her focus more on finishing the problem. A struggling student said she didn't like it because she couldn't get help from her group when on the hot seat. Students were much more quickly to adjust their paper and body to point to their work while verbally explaining a concept.
|From my classroom door, you can see everyone focusing on the problem, book, or glancing at the board for the problem.|
I was also able to implement the 5 practices using my Google Drive app by taking photos of student work to share when going over the answer and awarding the points.
For the second problem for list 1, it asks for a 180 degree rotation. A student asked which direction clockwise or counterclockwise? Another student answered, "it doesn't matter it will look the same!"
Here you can see that same triangle successfully reflected over the y-axis. Then student volunteers said you could then reflect it over the x axis and then translate it up 1 and over 2.
This photo shows the same problem, but also the second one where after graphing a triangle students were asked to reflect it over the y axis. Separately they were asked to translate it, and describe what happened to the coordinates.
Here is 2nd period's scoreboard.
Numbered steps that were easy to read.
Here you can see the horizontal, then vertical translation. You can also see the correct reflection over the y-axis. I asked students that made mistakes reflecting, "how far away is the shape from the axis you are trying to reflect it over?" This moved them in the correct direction.
Here you can see how students were able to show expressions for what happens to the coordinates when moving 4 to the right and down 6. They would have to add 4 to the x coordinate, and subtract 6 from the y coordinate.
Also, for reflecting, they had to multiply the x coordinate by -1, and leave the y coordinate alone.
My colleague and his students really enjoyed the hot seat activity as well. I picked a wednesday to try it since it was a shorter period and I knew they wouldn't be able to finish the 6.2.6 lesson during a short period.
Unfortunately, we only got through 3 rounds, but a LOT of learning happened, and these were dense problems. I had a short warm-up, reviewed 2 homework problems briefly, passed back a test that I went over, and then did the Hot Seat. The resource managers didn't get a chance to be on the hot seat, but I'm definitely going to do this again with a goal of students being on the hot seat more than once.
At the beginning, I told students that the goal of this activity was to see where you are at individually with their understanding, and to also appreciate the PRIVILEGE of working cooperatively in a group. I am very confident that students will be working much harder together tomorrow when working on a problem solving task about scale factors between models and real life objects.